Promoter Oscar De La Hoya is feeling particularly bullish lately, particularly regarding the ongoing discussions about a potential bout between his former fighter Canelo Alvarez and British boxer Chris Eubank Jr. This potential matchup, set to take place at the iconic Wembley Stadium, has stirred considerable excitement among British fans, much to De La Hoya’s chagrin. Taking to social media, De La Hoya’s vitriol spilled over as he criticized both the fervor of the UK boxing community and Eubank Jr.’s credentials as a serious opponent for Alvarez.
While De La Hoya’s remarks were undoubtedly blunt, they highlight a deeper concern regarding the caliber of opponents that Alvarez has been stepping into the ring against recently. De La Hoya expressed disbelief that such a fight could generate significant interest, labeling the avid UK fanbase as lacking a fundamental understanding of boxing. His assertion, “It would sell out Wembley because UK fans don’t know s*** about boxing,” not only illustrates his dismissive attitude but also raises questions about Eubank Jr.’s legitimacy as a contender.
The crux of De La Hoya’s perspective lies in the assertion that Eubank Jr. (boasting a record of 34 wins and 3 losses) is not a formidable challenge. Eubank Jr.’s recent victory over journeyman Kamil Szeremeta, following a lengthy hiatus, has not convinced critics of his qualifications to vie for titles currently held by the Mexican champion. While Eubank enjoys a degree of popularity in the UK—largely attributable to his lineage as the son of the famed Chris Eubank Sr.—his victory history against lesser opponents raises concerns about whether he truly deserves a shot at Alvarez.
Rather than a bout with Eubank Jr., De La Hoya believes that Alvarez should be pursuing more substantial challenges, specifically pointing to fighters like David Benavidez, Artur Beterbiev, Dmitry Bivol, or David Morrell. Each of these fighters possesses the skill set and experience that could pose a legitimate threat to Alvarez’s dominance in the ring. By calling out Eubank Jr. as another “unworthy” opponent, De La Hoya’s underlying message amplifies the notion that boxing should be about proving oneself against the best, rather than capitalizing on celebrity status or familial ties.
Reactions to De La Hoya’s comments have been mixed among fans and analysts alike. While some share his skepticism regarding Eubank Jr.’s fighting pedigree, others champion the idea of promoting accessibility in boxing, citing that high-profile matchups can stimulate interest in the sport. Regardless, it is clear that De La Hoya’s criticisms stem from a place of genuine concern for the integrity of the sport, advocating for bouts that offer not only excitement but challenge.
The buzz surrounding a matchup between Canelo Alvarez and Chris Eubank Jr. has not only ignited discussions about fan engagement but has also sparked a broader conversation about the nature and quality of boxing itself. If De La Hoya’s critiques resonate with an audience that desires authenticity in championship fights, it may prompt promoters and fighters alike to reconsider what it means to enter the squared circle.
Leave a Reply